Proposed Consensus-Based Canadian Integrative Oncology Research Priorities

Authors

  • Laura Weeks Ottawa Integrative Cancer Centre
  • Dugald Seely Ottawa Integrative Cancer Centre
  • Lynda Balneaves University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  • Heather Boon University of Toronto
  • Anne Leis University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon
  • Doreen Oneschuk University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Stephen Sagar McMaster University, Hamilton
  • Marja Verhoef University of Calgary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/ijwpc.v1i1.70

Keywords:

integrative oncology programs, complementary and conventional medical treatments

Abstract

Objectives: An increasing number of integrative oncology programs are being established across Canada that offer a combination of complementary and conventional medical treatments in a shift towards whole-person cancer care. It was our objective to identify consensus-based research priorities within a coherent research agenda to guide Canadian integrative oncology practice and policy moving forward.

Methods: Members of the Integrative Canadian Oncology Research Initiative and the Ottawa Integrative Cancer Centre organized a 2-day consensus workshop, which was preceded by a Delphi survey and stakeholder interviews.

Results: Eighty-one participants took part in Round 1 of the Delphi survey, 52 in Round 2 (66.2%) and 45 (86.5%) in Round 3. Nineteen invited stakeholders participated in the 2-day workshop held in Ottawa, Canada. Five inter-related priority research areas emerged as a foundation for a Canadian research agenda: Effectiveness; Safety; Resource and Health Services Utilization; Knowledge Translation; and Developing Integrative Oncology Models. Research is needed within each priority area from a range of different perspectives (e.g., patient, practitioner, health system) and that reflects a continuum of integration from the addition of a single complementary intervention within conventional cancer care to systemic change. Participants brainstormed strategic directions to implement the developing research agenda and identified related opportunities within Canada. A voting process helped to identify working groups to pursue strategic directions within the interest and expertise of meeting participants.

Conclusion: The identified research priorities reflect the needs and perspectives of a spectrum of integrative oncology stakeholders. Ongoing stakeholder consultation, including engagement from new stakeholders, is needed to ensure appropriate uptake and implementation of the Canadian research agenda.

Published

2014-01-19

How to Cite

Weeks, L., Seely, D., Balneaves, L., Boon, H., Leis, A., Oneschuk, D., Sagar, S., & Verhoef, M. (2014). Proposed Consensus-Based Canadian Integrative Oncology Research Priorities. The International Journal of Whole Person Care, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/ijwpc.v1i1.70